PHOTOS

Murray and Rosa Bell were not in Australia

Contradicting the fabricated tabloid claims, Rosa and Murray Bell were physically present during the repositioning of the Myers’ rear fence. They did not merely observe via CCTV, as falsely suggested. Instead, they actively harassed the sole contractor on site.

The contractor reported repeated verbal abuse, physical obstruction, and direct interference from both Rosa and Murray Bell throughout the works.

(Photo courtesy of contractor)

Unauthorised Access During Stand-Down Period

Rosa and Murray Bell, along with their friends, family members, and three contractors, walked through the Myers’ rear garden, even during the agreed three-month stand-down period.

Garden Shed Relocation

Rosa and Murray Bell’s garden shed was formally deemed a trespass by Rosa Bell’s own solicitor. Following legal advice, the Myers obtained a solicitor’s letter authorising the removal of all boundary-line trespasses prior to commencing works.

Contractors relocated the shed intact to the Bells’ patio. Contrary to tabloid claims, the process was orderly and caused no mess or destruction.

This was independently confirmed by two attending Police officers and two of Rosa and Murray Bell’s own friends who were present at the time.

Garden Shed permanent Relocation (2023)

A few months after the Myers’ fence was completed, Rosa and Murray Bell cut their garden shed in half and relocated it to their rear patio, where it remains in active use today.

(Photo from Rightmove, taken March 2025)

Rear Patio Remained Untouched

As evidenced in the accompanying photo, the rear patio remains intact and in active use, directly contradicting sensationalised tabloid claims that “They have completely wrecked the patio at the back.” This claim is demonstrably false.

Rosa and Murray Bell’s own solicitor formally identified the patio as a trespass. Contractors executed a clean boundary cut, removed the encroaching section, and returned all items. The photo further confirms that Rosa Bell’s patio on her side of the boundary was left untouched.

Notably, her son, Philip Bell, was staying at the property at the time and was reportedly heard shovelling debris around the patio area in preparation for their second surveyor’s report and tabloid photo-shoot.

Boundary corridor Between Properties

Boundary corridor Between Properties

Tabloid claims that the paving in the boundary corridor between Nos. 70 and 72 was “dug up” or “destroyed” are false. The paving was cleanly cut at the legal boundary line during the Myers’ fence installation and remains intact and in active use by Rosa and Murray Bell today.

See photographic views facing the rear garden (first photo) and the street (second photo).

Front Panel and Restoration Efforts

The original panel (photo 1) between Nos. 70 and 72 was professionally repaired and reinstated in its upright position to ensure security and containment within the boundary corridor.

Rosa Bell later removed the panel from its secured position for the purpose of a tabloid photo shoot and their second surveyor’s report.

Despite this, the panel remained in place for over two years before Rosa and Murray Bell replaced it with a garden shed (photo 2) in March 2025.

Fence Installation and Boundary Positioning

Misleading tabloid reports falsely claimed that the Myers’ fence was installed beyond their legal boundary. In reality, the work was carried out within the Myers’ property, except for a narrow section adjacent to the corner of their garage, where Rosa Bell granted explicit permission to complete the installation.

As shown in photo 3, the fence was re-aligned by only a few inches on the front drive, not the 1.9 metres sensationalised in the tabloid headlines. The final installation follows the official HMLR legal boundary.

Photo 3. The Myers' fence was realigned by a few inches, not 1.9m as sensationalised in the tabloids.

Photo 2. They replace the front panel with a Garden Shed

Photo 1. Front panel

Unsolicited Surveillance in February 2025

In February 2025, Rosa Bell was observed filming the Myers while they washed their car on their own driveway.

This unsolicited recording forms part of a broader pattern of surveillance and neighbourly hostility by Rosa and Murray Bell, following their unsuccessful court claim against the Myers.

Water Damage and Structural Impact from New Shed, March 2025

In March 2025, Rosa and Murray Bell installed a new shed at the street-end of the boundary corridor between the two properties. The shed appears to exceed the available space and has caused physical damage to the Myers’ two-year-old boundary fence, originally installed in 2023.

Additionally, the roof of Rosa Bell’s new shed has been positioned to purposely slope toward the Myers’ wall, directing rainwater runoff straight onto their house to cause further property damage.

Ongoing Harrassment