Tabloids claim that 'neither party can move' because of the boundary dispute
HM Land Registry records affirm there is no uncertainty regarding the boundary or fence ownership.
As there is no boundary dispute, both parties are free to move whenever they wish to.
FACT-CHECKING: Legal Boundary Confirmation and Media Misrepresentation
HM Land Registry has confirmed there is no formal lodgement of a boundary dispute.
As such, the original title deeds, which clearly define the boundary and ownership markers remain the legally binding and recognised property line.
The deed for No. 70 includes a standard T-mark confirming the Myers' ownership of the dividing fence. No. 72’s deed shows precise dimensions on all four sides of Rosa and Murray Bell’s property.
HM Land Registry records leave no ambiguity and affirm that there is no boundary dispute.
Media Claims and Public Misrepresentation
Several tabloids characterised the title deeds as “inconclusive” and “crude” , despite legal documentation and survey evidence showing clear and consistent boundary definition.
Misleading headlines further claimed that no effort had been made to resolve the matter amicably, ignoring over five years of documented mediation attempts.
Title Deed Summary for No. 72
Photos of the Original Conveyancing Title Deed for No. 72 showing dimensions on all four sides.
Having been found ineligible for adverse possession, Rosa and Murray Bell have no legal entitlement to alter or relocate the Myers’ fence from its lawful position at the paper title boundary.
Rosa and Murray Bell’s title deed does not show a T-mark on the dividing boundary. This is shown on the No. 70 (Myers) title deed, confirming ownership of the dividing fence is with the Myers.
The original conveyancing deed for No. 72 (held by Rosa and Murray Bell), shows dimensions clearly defining their property boundary as 40 feet by 150 feet.
November 2020
December 2020
April 2021
December 2021
February 2022
March 2022
February 2023
April 2023
June 2023
August 2023
September 2023
May 2025
Despite the Myers’ consistent willingness to resolve the matter respectfully and lawfully, their mediation requests were ignored, rejected or not engaged with by Rosa and Murray Bell.
Tabloids claimed the Myers made no attempt to "resolve the dispute amicably".
Here’s the documented truth.
Contrary to false tabloid claims, the Myers sought to mediate as early as November 2020.
The Myers’ documented efforts to resolve the matter through mediation span five years and multiple legal firms, clearly misrepresenting facts that they ‘made no attempt to resolve the dispute amicably.’
Mediation Attempts
March 2025 - SD/RWK Goodman
2024 – SD/RWK Goodman
2024 - AG/RWKG
2023 - GS/SCWLegal
2023 – GH/DMH Stallard
2023 - HJ/DMHS
2023 - DC/DMHS
2023 – CB/DMHS
2023 – JW/RWKG
2022 - AB/Setfords
2022 – referenced but unnamed solicitor
2021 – referenced but unnamed solicitor
January 2021 – referenced but unnamed solicitor
Solicitor Engagement Timeline
Rosa and Murray Bell’s Legal Pursuit of Adverse Possession
Despite the tabloids claiming they had “no legal support,” Rosa and Murray Bell retained multiple solicitors in their attempt to claim adverse possession.
The following is a documented list of solicitors retained by Palmira Rosa Bell and Murray Graeme Bell between 2021 and 2025, in connection with their boundary dispute and adverse possession claim against the Myers (No. 70).
These legal engagements contradict their public statements and tabloid claims of being unrepresented.
Rosa and Murray Bell may also have approached other companies to review their boundary documents.
To date, Rosa and Murray Bell’s attempts to amend their paper title boundary have been unsuccessful due to being ineligible for adverse possession.
© 2025 www.TruthinContext.co.uk. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means. This includes, but is not limited to, copying, sharing, screenshotting, or publishing without prior written permission from Truth in Context.
This site presents factual clarifications and contextual information in response to publicly available narratives. The material is based on documented evidence, official correspondence, and publicly accessible records. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create any legal relationship. Note in tabloids victoria huyeng myers has been shown as huy eng myers. www.Truthincontext.co.uk
#DailyMail #MailOnline #TheSun #TheMirror #MetroUK #EveningStandard #TheIndependent #TheGuardian #YahooNews #MSN #9News #SurreyLive #WalesOnline #BristolLive #KentLive #UKNews #BoundaryDispute #MediaAccountability #SWNS #SWNSMediaGroup #dailyrecord #express #manchestereveningnews #vtnews #newslibrary #dailynewsonline #dailymailonline #VictoriaHuyengMyers #BoundaryDisputeUK #EngineeringIntegrity #PropertyLawUK #VictoriaHuyEngMyers #DefamationLawUK #ReputationMatters #DailyMail #MailOnline #MediaAccountability #DailyMailAustralia #VictoriaHuyEngMyersStatement #DailyMailUS #DailyUSTimes #TheMirror #SurreyLive #ExpressUK #MSNNews #YahooUK #VictoriaHuyengMyersStatement #DailyMailAustralia #DailyMailUS #MailOnline #DailyMailCanada #DailyMailSouthAfrica #DailyMailItaly #TheTimes #TheSundayTimes #PoliticsTamed #nestia
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason
Revealed: The real reason